Q: In a recent column you recommended a list of ETFs. I generally agree with the list, and most certainly agree with your criteria. But iShares Lehman TIP, the Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities ETF, has baffled me for some time. I was interested in it from the beginning, but felt I did not understand it, so I just watched it. Over many years, including dividends, it has barely budged, sometimes appearing to lose value. It appears to me that a money market account will easily beat TIP. Is there some reason to believe this will change in the future? - B.A., Houston
Act Now! Activate a FREE three days trial to FinancialServicesCrossing.com, because you know how important it is to know about all the jobs.
A: Over the last few years a money market fund investment has done much better than investing in most bond funds. Over the 12 months ending July 31, for instance, Morningstar data indicates that the average taxable money market fund returned 4.77%. This return was higher than the average for ultra-short-term bond funds, short- and intermediate-term government bond funds, and inflation-protected bond funds. Only long-term government bond funds did better, returning an average 5.75%. The same pattern held over the last three years (see table below).
RECENT BOND FUND PERFORMANCE
This chart compares the trailing 12-month and three-year annualized returns on major categories of bond funds with the average taxable money market fund.
Fund Category
12 months
3 years
Taxable Money Market Funds
4.77 %
3.41 %
Ultra-Short-Term Bond Funds
4.36 %
3.37 %
Short-Term Government Funds
4.68 %
2.78 %
Intermediate-Term Govt. Funds
4.63 %
3.05 %
Long-Term Govt. Funds
5.75 %
4.80 %
Inflation-Protected Bond Funds
3.66 %
3.39 %
Vanguard Inf.-Protected
4.49 %
4.10 %
iShares Lehman TIPs ETF
4.47 %
4.08 %
Source: Morningstar, data for period ending July 31, 2007
Your impression of inflation-protected bond funds, however, is incorrect. While the group trailed other fund categories over the last 12 months, their return over the last three years was on par with money market funds and ultra-short-term funds. It was better than short- and intermediate-term government bond funds. Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities fund, which is frequently mentioned in this column, did better than all but the long-term government bond category over the last three years.
Recently, TIPS were priced to yield about 2.40% plus the rate of inflation. Personally, I love TIPS at 3% over inflation but think they are a reasonable investment down to 2% over inflation.
Q: What is your perspective on the Vanguard GNMA fund, with $12.7 billion in assets and a high Morningstar rating? My IRA is invested in that fund. I was disappointed with a return of 5% or less. Can you suggest an alternative fund at Vanguard to transfer my IRA into with the same level of risk but higher return? - S.G., Dallas
A: You're a pretty demanding guy. I've favored Vanguard GNMA (ticker: VFIIX) for many years because it provides a relatively high return at relatively low risk. If you check the latest Morningstar figures, it has ranked in the top 16%, 4%, 10%, 5% and 7% of all intermediate-term government bond funds over the last 12 months, three years, five years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively (figures are to month end of July).
So, what's not to like?
If you want a higher return I suggest that you (1) invest in equities and (2) build a more diversified portfolio with multiple asset classes. Your level of risk, of course, will be higher.
Vanguard Wellesley (ticker: VWINX) is a conservative allocation fund with less than 40% in equities. Vanguard
Wellington (ticker: VWELX) is about 60% equities invested in both foreign and domestic stocks. Wellington requires a minimum initial investment of $10,000, which is more than the usual $3,000 minimum for Vanguard funds. Of the two, I favor Wellington.
(Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent by e-mail to scott@scottburns.com or by fax to 505-424-0938. Check the Web site: www.scottburns.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns.)
Anna , Brentwood, TN
FinancialServicesCrossing is a fantastic website, and provides a lot of opportunities.
Malika , Houston, TX
The newswires on FinancialServicesCrossing is the best thing about the site. I like to read them regularly.
Laurie , Dallas, TX
FinancialServicesCrossing provides an excellent service. I have recommended the website to many people.
Sarah , Irving, TX
I am really pleased with the number of jobs and the quality of jobs on FinancialServicesCrossing.
Kevin , Charleston, WV
FinancialServicesCrossing is very easy to navigate. It is one of the simplest and at the same time most comprehensive site I have visited.
To compare FinancialServicesCrossing with other job sites
Financial Analyst – Denver United States-CO-Denver
Job Code: DEBA
ProLogis, a Fortune 500 company, is the leading provider of distribution facilities and services with distribution facilities owned,...
See Every Financial Services Job We Can Find on the Internet!
Unlike other sites, FinancialServicesCrossing works for you and does not charge employers to post jobs and actually goes out and researches jobs for you. The jobs you see are the jobs we find for you and not the ones employers are paying us to post.
To compare FinancialServicesCrossing with other job sites
FinancialServicesCrossing - #1 Job Aggregation and Private Job-Opening Research Service — The Most Quality Jobs Anywhere
FinancialServicesCrossing is the first job consolidation service in the employment industry to seek to include every job that exists and not charge employers to post jobs on its site.
FinancialServicesCrossing uses sophisticated technology and manual work to comb employer websites and other job boards for jobs and bring them all to its site.
